This essay argues that we cannot fully grasp what has been at stake in discussions following the January 2015 attacks in Paris, nor the symbolic place Charlie Hebdo has subsequently come to hold in French society, unless we pay attention to the ways in which gender, sex, and race have shaped both Charlie Hebdo’s visual register and contemporary representations of Frenchness and difference. Within the French context, difference has historically been assigned to bodies that are imagined to disrupt the proper gendered and sexual ordering of the nation, focusing recently on “Arab” and “Muslim” gendered bodies, just as Jewish bodies had been caricatured earlier in the twentieth century. This essay therefore argues that understanding Charlie Hebdo’s satire requires examining how the sexualization of race in representations of those deemed different, especially Muslims, has become incredibly banal in contemporary France. The magazine participated in rather than exposed what came to be seen as commonsense beliefs that both Left and Right relied on and that marginalized Muslims from the republican order.

中文翻译：

---

讽刺的性别与种族：查理周刊与当代法国的代表政治

这篇文章认为，除非我们注意性别、性行为的方式，否则我们无法完全掌握 2015 年 1 月巴黎袭击事件后讨论中的利害关系，也无法完全掌握查理周刊随后在法国社会中占据的象征地位。和种族塑造了查理周刊的视觉记录和法国性和差异的当代表现。在法国的背景下，历史上，差异被分配给被想象破坏国家正确性别和性秩序的身体，最近关注“阿拉伯”和“穆斯林”性别的身体，就像犹太身体在早期被漫画化一样。二十世纪。因此，这篇文章认为，要理解查理周刊的讽刺，需要研究如何在被视为不同的人的表现中考察种族的性别化，尤其是穆斯林，在当代法国已经变得非常平庸。该杂志参与而不是揭露后来被视为左派和右派所依赖的常识性信念，并将穆斯林从共和秩序中边缘化。