This essay examines similarities between the Hebrew chronicle of Shlomo bar Shimshon and the Latin chronicle of Albert of Aachen. Both sources describe the massacre of Rhineland Jews during the First Crusade and the subsequent defeat of the Crusaders by the Hungarians and the Bulgarians. On the basis of similarities in structure, content, and language between these two accounts, I argue that Shlomo chose to integrate at least one Christian source into his narrative. At the same time, I assert that it is unlikely that Shlomo’s Hebrew account was translated directly from Albert’s Latin chronicle. I present evidence indicating that the information conveyed in the Latin text reached the Jewish chronicler via vernacular channels, either oral or written.

中文翻译：

---

重述十字军在匈牙利的失败：犹太和基督教编年史家之间的文化接触

本文探讨了《什洛莫·巴尔·希姆森》的希伯来编年史与亚琛的阿尔伯特编年史之间的相似之处。两个消息来源都描述了第一次十字军东征期间对莱茵兰犹太人的屠杀以及随后匈牙利人和保加利亚人击败十字军。基于这两个叙述在结构、内容和语言上的相似性，我认为 Shlomo 选择将至少一个基督教资料整合到他的叙述中。同时，我断言，Shlomo 的希伯来文记述不太可能直接从 Albert 的拉丁文编年史翻译而来。我提供的证据表明拉丁文本中传达的信息通过口述或书面的方言渠道到达了犹太编年史家。