This article is first in a series dedicated to issues in the intellectual history of Mīmāṃsā in early modern India and part of a larger effort to broaden the basis for understanding the new formulations of central topics of the Mīmāṃsā textual-ritual complex in this period. It examines how the Varanasi scholar Khaṇḍadevamiśra makes use of Navyanyāya tools of analysis by putting under the microscope the example of his investigation and new formulation of the signification of agent and agency by the verbal affix in his ample analysis of the cognition of the meaning elements of a sentence (śābdabodha). Authors of Mīmāṃsā works in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gradually and selectively adopt the tools and techniques of cognitive analysis and the characteristic new idiom elaborated by Navyanaiyāyikas a few centuries earlier. This process of adoption arises on the sidelines of the Advaita–Dvaita Vedānta controversy in South India, then subsequently flourishes in Varanasi, as I have followed elsewhere (Diaconescu 2012a). In his analysis of the topic studied here, Khaṇḍadeva uses the new tools to revisit the Mīmāṃsā tradition in order to advance his new formulation while refuting certain Navyanyāya rival positions.

中文翻译：

---

旧话题，新表述：Khaṇḍadeva 和 Navyanyāya（早期现代印度吠陀诠释学研究，1）

这篇文章是系列文章中的第一篇，致力于探讨近代印度早期 Mīmāṃsā 思想史中的问题，也是扩大理解这一时期 Mīmāṃsā 文本-仪式复合体中心主题的新表述的基础的更大努力的一部分。它考察了瓦拉纳西学者 Khaṇḍadevamiśra 如何利用 Navyanyāya 分析工具，将他的研究实例放在显微镜下，并在他对事物的意义元素的认知的充分分析中，通过言语词缀对代理和代理的意义进行了新的表述。一个句子（śābdabodha）。Mīmāṃsā 的作者在 16 和 17 世纪逐渐有选择地采用了认知分析的工具和技术，以及几个世纪前由 Navyanaiyāyikas 阐述的特有的新习语。这种采用过程发生在印度南部的 Advaita-Dvaita Vedānta 争议的边缘，然后在瓦拉纳西蓬勃发展，正如我在其他地方所遵循的那样（Diaconescu 2012a）。在他对这里研究的主题的分析中，Khaṇḍadeva 使用新工具重新审视 Mīmāṃsā 传统，以推进他的新表述，同时驳斥某些 Navyanyāya 的敌对立场。