当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Labour Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Trade union representation for new forms of employment
European Labour Law Journal Pub Date : 2019-09-01 , DOI: 10.1177/2031952519870018
Monika Schlachter 1
Affiliation  

Defining the personal scope of application of the right to be represented by a trade union for collective bargaining purposes starts by defining the notion of employee/worker on whose behalf the conclusion of collective agreements is not disputed. In the German legal system, a sub-category of self-employed persons, known as ‘employee-like’ persons, is also included in the scope of the statute on collective agreements. For all other self-employed persons, however, no such statutory inclusion exists. They are, rather, prevented from collective price setting by (national und EU) competition law. Upon a closer look at the social purpose of exempting collective agreements from the restrictions of competition law, it is necessary to differentiate according to the existence of a structural power imbalance to the detriment of one contracting party much rather than according to the type of contract concluded. Some self-employed persons, specifically those categorised as workers under a new form of employment, do need collective bargaining as much as employees do, as they find themselves in a comparably weak individual bargaining position.

中文翻译:

工会代表新的就业形式

为集体谈判目的界定工会代表权的个人适用范围首先要定义雇员/工人的概念,而集体合同的缔结则不代表工人/工人。在德国法律体系中,自雇人士子类别(称为“类似雇员”的人)也包含在集体协议法规范围内。但是,对于所有其他自雇人士,不存在这样的法定包容性。相反,它们被(国家和欧盟)竞争法禁止集体定价。仔细研究将集体协议免于竞争法限制的社会目的,有必要根据结构性权力不平衡的存在做出很大的区别,而不是根据缔结的合同的类型来损害一个缔约方。一些自雇人士,特别是那些被归为新工作形式的工人,确实需要与雇员一样的集体谈判,因为他们发现自己处于相对较弱的个人谈判地位。
更新日期:2019-09-01
down
wechat
bug