In this article, I use the concept of chronotope, which means time-space, to analyse knowledge production at the intersection of science, technology and law. I do a comparative study of written legal decisions regarding criminal injuries compensation in rape cases from two different legal institutions in Norway—namely, the Compensation Authority and the criminal courts. In these written decisions, the two institutions state the reasons and justifications for their decisions by invoking, relying on and dismissing various kinds of knowledge, such as forensic, medical and psychological knowledge. The aim of this comparison is to investigate how these reasons and justifications constitute evidence and credibility. I argue that the two institutions attach themselves to different kinds of expert knowledge because they are chronotopically different and consequently constitute evidence and credibility in different ways.

中文翻译：

---

具身的真相与真实的自我：强奸案的证据构成与可信度

在这篇文章中，我用chronotope的概念来分析科学、技术和法律交叉处的知识生产。我对挪威两个不同法律机构（即赔偿局和刑事法院）关于强奸案刑事伤害赔偿的书面法律决定进行了比较研究。在这些书面决定中，两个机构通过援引、依赖和驳回各种知识，如法医、医学和心理知识来说明其决定的原因和理由。这种比较的目的是调查这些理由和理由如何构成证据和可信度。