:In light of the recent rise of destruction and looting of cultural property, a need for formalized heritage protection has arisen. Increasingly popular in the debate has become the instrument of international assistance known as “safe havens.” These temporary refuges for at-risk cultural goods in a third country have recently been implemented by Switzerland, France, the United States, and the Association of Art Museum Directors. We assess the contributions and shortcomings of these four regimes using a comparative approach. Mainly, we find that, despite variations in their scope and structure, none of the models accounts entirely for today’s major difficulties in protecting endangered cultural properties. We draw recommendations for future safe haven states against the backdrop of the existing models and hope to see the instrument used in practice as a way to safely isolate cultural property from destructive conflicts.

中文翻译：

---

受威胁文化遗产避风港的兴起

: 鉴于近期文化财产破坏和掠夺的增加，需要对遗产进行正式的保护。在辩论中越来越受欢迎的国际援助工具已成为被称为“避风港”的工具。瑞士、法国、美国和艺术博物馆馆长协会最近在第三国实施了这些用于危险文化物品的临时避难所。我们使用比较方法评估这四种制度的贡献和缺点。主要是，我们发现，尽管它们的范围和结构有所不同，但没有一个模型能完全解释当今保护濒危文化财产的主要困难。