ABSTRACT

This article examines intersecting agendas and concerns in global citizenship education (GCE) and education for sustainable development (ESD) in the face of current global crises and pressures. While it cannot be assumed that the two educational projects automatically converge, generative and promising overlaps emerge from the shared interest in the SDG 4.7 education target. The article elaborates on a conversation emerging from the Bridge47 Knowledge Exchange Partnership focused on critical global citizenship education, and discusses the tensions, ambiguities, limitations and implications for critical, transgressive and potentially transformative GCE + ESD. While GCE and ESD can be ambivalent and constrained in formal educational settings, especially in comparison to informal projects where there are direct partnerships with people living on the margins of society, we argue that the potential generativity and transgressive possibilities of engaged and collaborative research have been under-emphasised. Participatory and praxis methodologies where education and research overlap offer significant transgressive and transformative potential. We point to important collaborative potentials in research practice that can help to bridge GCE-ESD gaps, given their substantial theoretical and practical experience in situated contexts, engagement with transgressive politics and creative and inclusive ethics of practice.

摘要

面对当前的全球危机和压力，本文探讨了全球公民教育 (GCE) 和可持续发展教育 (ESD) 的交叉议程和关注点。虽然不能假设这两个教育项目会自动融合，但从可持续发展目标 4.7 教育目标的共同利益中出现了生成性和有希望的重叠。这篇文章详细阐述了 Bridge47 知识交流合作伙伴关系中关于关​​键全球公民教育的对话，并讨论了关键性、越界性和潜在变革性 GCE + ESD 的紧张、模糊、限制和影响。虽然 GCE 和 ESD 在正规教育环境中可能存在矛盾和限制，特别是与与生活在社会边缘的人们建立直接伙伴关系的非正式项目相比，我们认为参与和合作研究的潜在生成性和越界可能性没有得到重视。教育和研究重叠的参与和实践方法提供了显着的超越和变革潜力。我们指出研究实践中重要的合作潜力，可以帮助弥合 GCE-ESD 差距，因为他们在特定情境中拥有丰富的理论和实践经验，参与越界政治以及创造性和包容性的实践伦理。教育和研究重叠的参与和实践方法提供了显着的超越和变革潜力。我们指出研究实践中重要的合作潜力，可以帮助弥合 GCE-ESD 差距，因为他们在特定情境中拥有丰富的理论和实践经验，参与越界政治以及创造性和包容性的实践伦理。教育和研究重叠的参与和实践方法提供了显着的超越和变革潜力。我们指出研究实践中重要的合作潜力，可以帮助弥合 GCE-ESD 差距，因为他们在特定情境中拥有丰富的理论和实践经验，参与越界政治以及创造性和包容性的实践伦理。