The present preregistered meta‐analysis aimed to assess the evidence regarding the work–family interactions, as dyadic studies report them. The introduction differentiated between spillover (or intra‐individual) effects and crossover (or inter‐individual) effects by using dyadic studies. Following an online and reference list search, out of the initial 339 studies, 36 eligible articles reported correlations between one partner's variables and the other partner's variables. Analyses included 1504 effect sizes and used meta‐analytical calculations and structural equation modeling. Both partners' well‐being measures had small proportions of shared variance (i.e. shared variance up to 13.69%). The following analyses focused on the potential effects that could explain the shared variance of family‐related well‐being. There was little evidence of a crossover effect from one's work‐related variables toward the partners’ family‐related well‐being. Furthermore, analyses using structural equation modeling did not yield any results to support a crossover effect from one's work–family interaction toward their partner's well‐being. These findings suggest that the literature needs new research studies regarding how family‐related demands and resources are related to well‐being and personal resources in the crossover processes.

中文翻译：

---

更好或更坏的家庭相关福祉：二元研究中交叉效应的荟萃分析

目前的预注册荟萃分析旨在评估有关工作-家庭互动的证据，正如二元研究报告的那样。引言通过使用二元研究区分了溢出（或个体内部）效应和交叉（或个体间）效应。在在线和参考列表搜索之后，在最初的 339 项研究中，36 篇符合条件的文章报告了一个合作伙伴的变量与另一个合作伙伴的变量之间的相关性。分析包括 1504 个效应量，并使用元分析计算和结构方程建模。双方的幸福感测量的共享方差比例很小（即共享方差高达 13.69%）。以下分析侧重于可以解释家庭相关幸福感的共同差异的潜在影响。几乎没有证据表明一个人的工作相关变量对伴侣的家庭幸福感有交叉影响。此外，使用结构方程模型进行的分析并没有产生任何结果来支持一个人的工作-家庭互动对其伴侣幸福感的交叉效应。这些发现表明，文献需要关于家庭相关需求和资源如何与跨界过程中的幸福和个人资源相关的新研究。