The potential for growth within a relationship between individuals experiencing “psychotic” and “nonpsychotic” realities in based in acceptance of a shared human vulnerability. Through the human-to-human relationship, acceptance of the mutual experience of ontological insecurity and fear of nihilation can facilitate the emergence of a “nonpsychotic” reality. Interconnectedness, that occurs through the process of growth within a loving, nongoal–orientated relationship, leads to a negation of the need for an altered state to exist to defend the threat of nihilation in the person experiencing “psychosis,” and the person in a “nonpsychotic” state to resist the attempt to change the legitimate reality the other person is experiencing. The ensuing changes to the liminal space occupied by a person said to be in a “psychotic” state, when being together in a coexisting same experience, can lead to mutual growth and the evaporation of the so labelled “psychotic” state. This demonstrates the “psychotic” experience is more consistent with a dissociative response to threat in relationship and could be reframed as a “Dissociachotic”—a form of dissociation that has been mislabelled as a unique condition of “psychosis” due to its specific representation of creating safety for a person experiencing threat in relationship.

在接受共同的人类脆弱性的基础上，经历“精神病”和“非精神病”现实的个人之间的关系中潜在的增长。通过人与人的关系，接受本体论不安全感和恐惧虚无的共同经验可以促进“非精神病性”现实的出现。在以非目标为导向的爱的关系中，成长过程中出现的相互联系导致人们对存在改变状态以抵御遭受“精神病”的人和处于精神病状态的人的虚无性威胁的需求的否定。 “非精神病”状态可以抵制改变他人正在经历的合法现实的尝试。据说处于“精神病”状态的人所占据的门限空间随之发生变化，在一起共处时，会导致共同成长和所谓“精神病”状态的消失。这表明“精神病”经历与对关系中威胁的解离反应更一致，并且可以重新定义为“解离性痴呆”（dissociachotic）。这种解离形式由于其特定的代表而被错误地标记为“精神病”的独特条件。为遭受恋爱关系威胁的人创造安全感。