Research has predominantly focused on the positive aspects of living a calling (LC), hence more attention needs to be given to its potentially negative aspects. The current study examined profiles of 237 South Korean working adults, defined by individuals’ scores on LC, burnout, exploitation, and work–life imbalance from a person-centered perspective. Then, we examined the role of psychological capital, organizational support, and adequate compensation in predicting profile membership. Lastly, we examined mean differences across class membership in the levels of job satisfaction and work-related psychological and physical symptoms. Latent profile analysis identified three distinct profiles of individuals: the adaptive, average, and maladaptive. Psychological capital, organizational support, and adequate compensation predicted a higher likelihood of membership into the adaptive group, compared to the average group. The adaptive group showed the highest job satisfaction and the lowest work-related psychological symptoms. Implications for calling-related interventions and directions for future research are discussed.

研究主要集中在生活呼叫（LC）的积极方面，因此需要对其潜在的消极方面给予更多关注。当前的研究调查了以个人为中心的237名韩国在职成年人的概况，这些概况是根据个人在LC，倦怠，剥削和工作与生活失衡方面的得分来定义的。然后，我们研究了心理资本，组织支持和适当报酬在预测个人资料成员资格方面的作用。最后，我们研究了班级成员在工作满意度和与工作相关的心理和身体症状水平上的平均差异。潜在特征分析确定了个人的三个不同特征：适应性，平均和适应不良。与平均水平相比，心理资本，组织支持和足够的报酬预示了适应性小组成员的可能性更高。该自适应组表现出最高的工作满意度和最低工作相关的心理症状。讨论了与呼叫相关的干预措施的含义以及未来研究的方向。