The current scholarly communis opinio holds that the referent of the title of Varro’s Bimarcus and the Menippean satire’s two speakers are not (as previously believed) two different men named Marcus but rather two sides of the Varro-ego himself, arguing in an internal dialogue.1 Joel Relihan sees the split-author dialogue of Persius poem 1 as a reiteration of Bimarcus, and Kirk Freudenburg argues that Bimarcus is the inspiration both for the split persona of the satirist in Persius poem 3 and for the bewildering nested quotations of Damasippus in Horace’s Sermones 2.3, while Mikhail Bakhtin presents Bimarcus as the foundation for the enduring western literary trope of the author split in two.2 I argue, in turn, that

中文翻译：

---

瓦罗的比马库斯与普劳图斯的 Epidicus 和 Amphitruo 中的自我相遇

当前学术界的共同观点认为，Varro 的 Bimarcus 和 Menippean 讽刺的两个演讲者的标题所指的对象并不是（如先前所认为的）两个不同的名为 Marcus 的人，而是 Varro-ego 本人的两个方面，在内部对话中进行了争论。 1 Joel Relihan 认为 Persius 诗 1 的作者分裂对话是对 Bimarcus 的重复，Kirk Freudenburg 认为 Bimarcus 是 Persius 诗 3 中讽刺作家分裂人格的灵感来源，也是 Horace 诗中令人眼花缭乱的 Damasipus 嵌套引文的灵感来源布道 2.3，而米哈伊尔·巴赫金 (Mikhail Bakhtin) 将比马库斯 (Bimarcus) 作为作者将西方文学比喻一分为二的持久西方文学比喻的基础。 2 我认为，反过来，