Abstract No systematic investigations of Elfriede Jelinek’s authorial positioning within the hierarchies of the literary field exist. Previous research has nevertheless noted that the authorship is distinguished by a high degree of reflexivity in relation to the power structures it confronts. Studies on the very earliest phase of establishing herself in the Austrian literary field in the years 1966–1969 have, however, emphasized two characteristics: social isolation and literary imitation. Both aspects suggest authorial immaturity if not inferiority, which seems oddly anachronistic and normative given the astonishingly rapid literary success of Jelinek in this period. This article relates the early success to a shift of values in the literary field at the end of the 1960 s, which allowed for new forms of provocative and experimental expressions to generate literary capital. Jelinek’s transgressive authorial dispositions accumulate symbolic capital using a combination of eclectic texts and strategies of self-fashioning within quite diverse contexts, drawing on social networks, media outlets, and literary publications. The theoretical framework primarily draws on concepts developed by Pierre Bourdieu, most notably habitus and symbolic capital.

中文翻译：

---

Eine Revolutionäre Solitärin？

摘要 目前还没有关于 Elfriede Jelinek 在文学领域的等级制度中的作者定位的系统调查。然而，先前的研究指出，作者身份的特征在于与其所面临的权力结构相关的高度反思性。然而，对 1966 年至 1969 年在奥地利文学领域建立自己的最早阶段的研究强调了两个特征：社会孤立和文学模仿。这两个方面都表明作者不成熟，如果不是自卑的话，考虑到耶利内克在这一时期惊人的文学成功，这似乎是奇怪的不合时宜和规范。这篇文章将早期的成功与 1960 年代末文学领域的价值观转变联系起来，这允许新形式的挑衅性和实验性表达产生文学资本。耶利内克 (Jelinek) 的越界作者倾向在相当不同的背景下，利用不拘一格的文本和自我塑造策略的组合，利用社交网络、媒体渠道和文学出版物，积累了象征资本。理论框架主要借鉴了皮埃尔·布迪厄 (Pierre Bourdieu) 开发的概念，其中最著名的是惯习和符号资本。