当前位置: X-MOL 学术Studies in East European Thought › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
M. M. Bakhtin and the German proto-Romantic tradition
Studies in East European Thought ( IF 0.250 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-23 , DOI: 10.1007/s11212-019-09347-0
John Cook

This paper seeks to explore the relationship between Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin’s theoretical apparatus and ideas of the immediate precursors of the Jena Romantik school of German Romanticism: Johann Georg Hamann (1730–1788) and Johann Gottfried Herder (1744–1803). In doing so, it examines the themes and treatments that are common to these two thinkers and Bakhtin, tracing the tradition of anti-systematic thought through Hamann, Nietzsche and Bakhtin, and the transmission of Herder’s philosophy of Bildung through the Russian cultural milieu and Goethe. Initially, the paper briefly outlines the early German Romantic ‘school’ of philosophy as a prelude to a more detailed examination of the ways in which Bakhtin assimilated German philosophy in general. The paper’s section on Hamann commences with a review of his background, using this as a basis for establishing connections between Hamann’s approach to communication and that of Bakhtin, based on a common epistemology focused on the self. The section on Herder is centred on his concept of Bildung and his historicist approach to literature, both of which interests Bakhtin shared. The paper then examines a number of conduits for Herder’s thought to Bakhtin, including Kant and Goethe. The paper concludes by examining Isaiah Berlin’s notion of the ‘Counter-Enlightenment’—in which movement he includes both Hamann and Herder—and the extent to which Bakhtin could be said to form part of this tradition.

中文翻译:

MM Bakhtin 与德国原始浪漫主义传统

本文旨在探讨米哈伊尔·米哈伊洛维奇·巴赫金的理论机构与德国浪漫主义耶拿罗曼蒂克学派的直接先驱思想之间的关系:约翰·乔治·哈曼(1730-1788)和约翰·戈特弗里德·赫尔德(1744-1803)。在此过程中,它考察了这两位思想家和巴赫金共有的主题和处理方法,通过哈曼、尼采和巴赫金追溯了反系统思想的传统,以及赫尔德的教育哲学通过俄罗斯文化环境和歌德的传播. 最初,这篇论文简要概述了早期德国浪漫主义哲学“学派”,作为对巴赫金总体上同化德国哲学的方式进行更详细考察的序幕。论文中关于哈曼的部分首先回顾了他的背景,以此为基础,在哈曼的交流方法和巴赫金的交流方法之间建立联系,基于一个共同的认识论集中在自我。关于赫尔德的部分集中在他的教育概念和他对文学的历史主义方法上,这两者都是巴赫金所共有的。然后,该论文检查了赫尔德对巴赫金的思想的许多渠道,包括康德和歌德。这篇论文最后考察了以赛亚·伯林的“反启蒙运动”概念——其中他包括哈曼和赫尔德——以及巴赫金在多大程度上可以说是这一传统的一部分。关于赫尔德的部分集中在他的教育概念和他对文学的历史主义方法上,这两者都是巴赫金所共有的。然后,该论文检查了赫尔德对巴赫金的思想的许多渠道,包括康德和歌德。这篇论文最后考察了以赛亚·伯林的“反启蒙运动”概念——其中他包括哈曼和赫尔德——以及巴赫金在多大程度上可以说是这一传统的一部分。关于赫尔德的部分集中在他的教育概念和他对文学的历史主义方法上,这两者都是巴赫金所共有的。然后,该论文检查了赫尔德对巴赫金的思想的许多渠道,包括康德和歌德。这篇论文最后考察了以赛亚·伯林的“反启蒙运动”概念——其中他包括哈曼和赫尔德——以及巴赫金在多大程度上可以说是这一传统的一部分。
更新日期:2019-12-23
down
wechat
bug