The growth in size, role and authority of private security has triggered a variety of regulatory reactions. These have stimulated a growing academic debate on preferred regulatory models. This paper summarizes the key existing models of regulation. It then provides a critique of the observations of Loader and White (Regul Gov 11(2):166–184, 2017) on the existing models. It critically examines their proposed model and outlines how we believe that private security regulation can be enhanced by setting out ‘three-pillars’ of effective regulation. The literature and research points towards the need for a regulatory pillar that enhances the wider private security sector, a distributive pillar that addresses security inequality and lastly a responsibility pillar designed to align the private security industry with the public interest.

中文翻译：

---

“监管的三大支柱模式”：私人安保治理模式的融合

私人保安的规模、作用和权威的增长引发了各种监管反应。这些都激发了关于首选监管模式的学术辩论。本文总结了现有的主要监管模式。然后，它对 Loader 和 White（Regul Gov 11 (2): 166-184, 2017）对现有模型的观察提出了批评。它批判性地审查了他们提出的模型，并概述了我们如何相信通过制定有效监管的“三大支柱”来加强私人安保监管。文献和研究表明，需要一个加强更广泛的私营安保部门的监管支柱，一个解决安全不平等的分配支柱，最后是一个旨在使私营安保行业与公共利益保持一致的责任支柱。