In this paper, we analyse case marking in Russian eventive nominalisations as recently discussed in an article by Pereltsvaig et al. published in this journal in 2018 with regards to two competing theories of case: the Inherent Case Theory and the Dependent Case Theory. We contest the view that Russian eventive nominalisations display ergative alignment and argue that Russian is a nominative-accusative language across the board. We propose an alternative analysis of Russian eventive nominalisations and show that, contrary to the claims made by Pereltsvaig et al. they are in principle incapable of disproving the Dependent Case Theory. The resulting analysis is trivially compatible with the Dependent Case Theory.

中文翻译：

---

重新审视俄罗斯事件名词化中的案例标记

在本文中，我们分析了 Pereltsvaig 等人最近在一篇文章中讨论的俄罗斯事件名词化中的案例标记。2018 年在本期刊上发表了关于两种相互竞争的案例理论：固有案例理论和从属案例理论。我们对俄语事件名词化显示作格对齐的观点提出异议，并认为俄语是一种全面的主格-宾格语言。我们提出了对俄罗斯事件名词化的另一种分析，并表明与 Pereltsvaig 等人提出的主张相反。他们原则上不能反驳从属案例理论。由此产生的分析与从属案例理论非常兼容。