In its contents as well as discursive strategy, Plato’s Republic occasions a few reflections on the phenomenon of memory. The essay situates the philosophical discourse, along with that of divination and poetry, in the context of the practices of memory and, more broadly, within the sphere of Mnemosune. The figure of the philosopher retains traces of archaic humanity, most notably of the Homeric hero. At the same time, in the Platonic Socrates we discern a transfiguration of heroic heritage, in the direction of a thorough ethical recalibration emphasizing the awareness of mortality, the art of finite life (βίος), and the visionary celebration of life (ζωή) in its excessive and indestructible movement. In this way, at the very heart of the Republic we may heed the cipher and resonance of Dionysus.

中文翻译：

---

流放时光

柏拉图的《共和》在内容和话语策略上都对记忆现象进行了一些反思。这篇文章将哲学话语以及占卜和诗歌置于记忆实践的背景下，更广泛地说，在 Mnemosune 的领域内。这位哲学家的形象保留了古代人性的痕迹，尤其是荷马式英雄的痕迹。与此同时，在柏拉图的苏格拉底中，我们看到了英雄遗产的变形，在彻底的伦理重新校准的方向上，强调对死亡的认识、有限生命的艺术（βίος）和对生命的有远见的庆祝（ζωή）。它的过度和坚不可摧的运动。通过这种方式，我们可以在共和国的核心听到狄俄尼索斯的密码和共鸣。