当前位置: X-MOL 学术Research in Phenomenology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Δύναµις and Dasein, Ἐνέργεια and Ereignis
Research in Phenomenology Pub Date : 2018-09-27 , DOI: 10.1163/15691640-12341404
Francisco J. Gonzalez 1
Affiliation  

The “destructive” appropriation of the Aristotelian concepts of δύναµις and ἐνέργeια played a central role in Martin Heidegger’s own reflection on the meaning of being. While this has been generally known for some time, it is only now that we can understand the full scope, complexity and evolving character of this appropriation. One reason is the fairly recent publication (in 2012, Gesamtausgabe 83) of notes and protocols for seminars Heidegger led on Aristotle as late as the 1940s and 1950s. Another is the existence of student transcripts in the Special Collections Department of Stanford University for a number of unpublished seminars on Aristotle that Heidegger led during the 1920s. Considering all of this material enables us to see both the significance of Heidegger’s interpretation of the δύναµις/ἐνέργιeα pair as well as how this interpretation evolved along with his own “Kehre”: from a “pandynamic” conception of being to being as “Ereignis.”

中文翻译:

Δύναμις 和此在、Ἐνέργεια 和本在

对亚里士多德的δύναμις 和ἐνέργeια 概念的“破坏性”挪用在马丁·海德格尔自己对存在意义的反思中发挥了核心作用。虽然这已经为人所知有一段时间了,但直到现在我们才能理解这种挪用的全部范围、复杂性和不断发展的特征。一个原因是最近出版的(2012 年,Gesamtausgabe 83)海德格尔在 1940 年代和 1950 年代领导的关于亚里士多德的研讨会的笔记和协议。另一个是斯坦福大学特别收藏系的学生成绩单存在于海德格尔在 1920 年代领导的一些未发表的亚里士多德研讨会上。
更新日期:2018-09-27
down
wechat
bug