当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ratio Juris › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Protección, limitación y vulneración del ejercicio de derechos fundamentales en la persecución penal
Ratio Juris Pub Date : 2018-12-31 , DOI: 10.24142/raju.v13n27a7
Saúl Uribe García 1
Affiliation  

The present investigation is of hermeneutic and doctrinal character, starting from the norm and crossing the principles and values that give sense to the fundamental rights as teleology’s purpose, and the distintive character of the norm and the doctrine as the must be of the norm. To this end, it is argued that the State retains the monopoly of administering criminal justice, and the criminal process becomes an appropriate scenario to achieve this task, regardless of the decision by which finiquite. The exercise of the state’s “ius puniendi” revolves around the exercise of fundamental rights, mainly of the indicted, accused, accused or convicted, from three alternatives. The first, the protection of the exercise of fundamental rights as an obligation of the State, against limitation or violation. The second, the limitation of the exercise of fundamental rights, provided that the conditions and constitutional and legal requirements are observed. The third, the violation of the exercise of fundamental rights when there is arbitrary and illegal interference, which neutralizes its exercise. Faced with the violation of the exercise of fundamental rights, in criminal proceedings, several mechanisms are activated, depending on each case and type of violation, whose consequence is the procedural sanction from different points of view and, consequently, the restoration and enjoyment of of the exercise of the fundamental right violated. Taking into account the above, the article shows that in the investigation, trial and criminal execution, and in the intervention of the Prosecutor, defense and victim have limits: respect for the exercise of fundamental rights.

中文翻译:

Prosección,limitación和vulneracióndel ejercicio de derechos basices en lapersecución刑

本研究具有解释性和学说性,从规范开始,跨越了对作为目的论目的的基本权利有意义的原则和价值观,以及规范和原则作为规范必不可少的独特性。为此,有人争辩说,国家保留了管理刑事司法的垄断,而刑事诉讼程序成为实现这一任务的适当方案,而不论最后的决定如何。国家“ ius puniendi”的行使围绕着基本权利的行使,主要是来自三种选择的被告,被告,被告或定罪的基本权利。首先,保护基本权利的行使是国家的义务,不受限制或侵犯。第二,在遵守条件以及宪法和法律要求的前提下,行使基本权利的限制。第三,在任意和非法干预下侵犯了基本权利的行使,从而抵消了其行使。面对侵犯基本权利的行为,在刑事诉讼中,根据每种情况和侵犯的类型,启动了几种机制,其结果是从不同的角度对程序进行制裁,从而恢复和享有权利。基本权利的行使受到侵犯。考虑到上述情况,该条表明,在调查,审判和刑事执行以及检察官的干预下,辩方和受害人有局限性:尊重基本权利的行使。
更新日期:2018-12-31
down
wechat
bug