reimaginings of people like Jenny Roberts, Mark Drakeford and Bill Jordan and the beyond offending behaviour thinking of numerous others both within and close to the probation service. Third, the need for a revival of vocationally driven, altruistic public service might have been made more explicit than implicit, although it must be said that the authors do explicitly express their lack of fear of the label ‘utopianis’. Finally, a lesser quibble about references being placed at the end of each chapter, giving the impression of an edited volume rather than one based on integrated authorship. At the risk of exhausting the journey metaphor (deployed extensively and effectively in the book), I would say that this a demanding but nevertheless rewarding intellectual trek over challenging and rugged terrain. It is an authoritative, lucidly expressed book that is a worthwhile and illuminating read for those seriously interested in the future of humanistic, evidence-informed endeavour within the probation service but an essential read for Cycloptic politicians from across the political spectrum.

中文翻译：

---

囚犯激进化和恐怖主义拘留政策：制度化的恐惧还是基于证据的政策制定？

重新想象像珍妮·罗伯茨、马克·德雷克福德和比尔·乔丹这样的人，以及对缓刑服务内部和附近的许多其他人的冒犯行为的思考。第三，复兴职业驱动的、利他的公共服务的必要性可能比隐含的更明确，尽管必须说作者确实明确表达了他们对“乌托邦”标签的恐惧。最后，关于在每章末尾放置参考文献的较少狡辩，给人一种编辑卷的印象，而不是基于综合作者身份的卷。冒着用尽旅程比喻的风险（在书中广泛有效地部署），我会说这是一次在具有挑战性和崎岖地形上的艰巨但仍然有益的智力跋涉。是权威的，