当前位置: X-MOL 学术Power and Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Researching religious authority in education: Political theology, elites’ theory and the double nexus
Power and Education Pub Date : 2018-03-01 , DOI: 10.1177/1757743818757256
Liam Gearon 1 , Arniika Kuusisto 2
Affiliation  

This article provides a theoretical frame to structure methodological approaches to examining religious authority in education. It does so by examining the complex, overlapping relationship between secular and religious authority and the institutional power of education evident through responses to issues of cultural expression. The political theologies research examined ongoing tensions – accommodations, conflicts and resolutions – of religious authority with secular political systems, legal frameworks and institutions of educational replication. Through the data it became clear that education – in the broadest sense, as well as in its formal institutional structures – provided a mediating role for power exchanges between religious and political authority, which was especially evident in responses of religious leaders to issues of cultural and self-expression. Through interviews with senior religious leaders and authority figures in England – technically religious ‘elites’ – the findings provide insights into a ‘double nexus’ conceptual framework for researching religious authority in education: first, the internal nexus within religious traditions and, second, the external nexus of religious communities with secular, legal and political authority. Theoretically and methodologically, this represents a critical synthesis of political theology and elites’ theory, providing as yet underexplored possibilities for researching religious authority in education.

中文翻译:

研究教育中的宗教权威:政治神学,精英理论和双重关系

本文为构建研究宗教权威的方法论方法提供了理论框架。它通过考察世俗和宗教权威与教育的制度力量之间复杂,重叠的关系来做到这一点,这种关系通过对文化表现形式问题的回应而显而易见。政治神学研究考察了宗教权威与世俗政治制度,法律框架和教育复制机构之间的持续紧张关系-和解,冲突和解决。通过这些数据,可以清楚地看出,从最广泛的意义上以及在其正式的体制结构上,教育为宗教和政治权威之间的权力交流提供了中介作用,这在宗教领袖对文化和自我表达问题的回应中尤为明显。通过对英格兰高级宗教领袖和权威人物的采访(从技术上讲是宗教“精英”),研究结果提供了对研究教育权威的“双重联系”概念框架的见解:首先是宗教传统内的内在联系,其次是具有世俗,法律和政治权威的宗教社区的外部联系。从理论上和方法上,这代表了政治神学和精英理论的批判性综合,为研究教育中的宗教权威提供了尚未被探索的可能性。通过对英格兰高级宗教领袖和权威人物的采访(从技术上讲是宗教“精英”),研究结果提供了对研究教育权威的“双重联系”概念框架的见解:首先是宗教传统内的内在联系,其次是具有世俗,法律和政治权威的宗教社区的外部联系。从理论上和方法上,这代表了政治神学和精英理论的批判性综合,为研究教育中的宗教权威提供了尚未被探索的可能性。通过对英格兰高级宗教领袖和权威人物的采访(从技术上讲是宗教“精英”),研究结果提供了对研究教育权威的“双重联系”概念框架的见解:首先是宗教传统内的内在联系,其次是具有世俗,法律和政治权威的宗教社区的外部联系。从理论上和方法上,这代表了政治神学和精英理论的批判性综合,为研究教育中的宗教权威提供了尚未被探索的可能性。法律和政治权威。从理论上和方法上,这代表了政治神学和精英理论的批判性综合,为研究教育中的宗教权威提供了尚未被探索的可能性。法律和政治权威。从理论上和方法上,这代表了政治神学和精英理论的批判性综合,为研究教育中的宗教权威提供了尚未被探索的可能性。
更新日期:2018-03-01
down
wechat
bug