This article re‐examines Cumann na nGaedheal's approach to party organisation. Cumann na nGaedheal has been portrayed as a badly organised, 'top‐down' party that suffered electorally for its reluctance to match the structure and organisation of its main anti‐Treaty rival, Fianna Fail. Moreover, the party has been caricatured as a conservative organisation with little affinity for the ideology of the Irish revolution. While recent studies have reappraised Cumann na nGaedheal's engagement with the revolutionary inheritance, while highlighting underappreciated aspects of the party's electoral innovations, its organisational structures require further scholarly attention. Closer scrutiny of Cumann na nGaedheal's organisational structures sheds further light on its fate as nationalist Ireland's first party of government and ultimately its demise as a distinct party in 1933

中文翻译：

---

结构和成员：Cumann na nGaedheal 党组织概览，1923-33

本文重新审视了 Cumann na nGaedheal 的政党组织方法。Cumann na nGaedheal 被描绘成一个组织不良的“自上而下”的政党，由于不愿与其主要的反条约竞争对手 Fianna Fail 的结构和组织相匹配，因此在选举中遭受了损失。此外，该党被讽刺为一个保守的组织，与爱尔兰革命的意识形态几乎没有关系。虽然最近的研究重新评估了 Cumann na nGaedheal 对革命遗产的参与，同时强调了党的选举创新未被充分认识的方面，但其组织结构需要进一步的学术关注。对 Cumann na nGaedheal 的组织结构进行更仔细的审查，进一步揭示了其作为爱尔兰民族主义者的命运。