Abstract The importance of religious figures in Heidegger’s early development has long been understood. Beginning especially in the WS-1920, with the Phenomenology of Religious Life lectures, figures such as Paul and Augustine played essential roles in his early attempt to move beyond the legacy of Cartesian thought. Despite appearing to secularize these accounts, Heidegger nonetheless implies that it is because of their religiosity, and not in spite of it, that they are of phenomenological interest. For this reason, the exact status of religious descriptions in his phenomenology has been a source of contention. My argument in this paper, is that this status is best understood by turning to Heidegger’s early approach to phenomenological reading. This approach, I argue, is grounded in a performative model of language, exemplified in Destruction [Destruktion], and defines the limits within which he can engage with the religious character of historical texts.

中文翻译：

---

现象学阅读：海德格尔对圣保罗和圣奥古斯丁宗教经验的态度

摘要宗教人物在海德格尔早期发展中的重要性早已为人所知。特别是从WS-1920开始，随着《宗教生活现象学》的讲座，保罗和奥古斯丁等人物在他早期尝试超越笛卡尔思想传统的过程中发挥了重要作用。尽管看起来世俗化了这些说法，海德格尔仍然暗示，正是由于他们的宗教信仰，而不是尽管如此，他们才具有现象学的意义。由于这个原因，宗教描述在他的现象学中的确切地位一直引起争论。我在本文中的观点是，可以通过转向海德格尔的现象学阅读的早期方法来最好地理解这种状态。我认为这种方法是建立在语言的表现模型基础上的，