Abstract The feminist theological and historical work of Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza has been met with diverging responses. For feminist biblical scholars, Schüssler Fiorenza is essential reading, with even her works from the 1970s and 1980s still standing as key reference points. For mainstream (“malestream”) biblical scholarship, however, her entire body of writing is typically ignored, including within historical Jesus research (HJR), despite its value in both problematising and advancing the so-called Quests for the Historical Jesus. By evaluating and synthesising Schüssler Fiorenza’s HJR work on fundamentalism, feminism, and anti-Semitism, this article situates the effects of Schüssler Fiorenza’s work and the credibility of her critics within the Quests. While the themes Schüssler Fiorenza addresses, such as feminism and Judaism, are key features of the Third Quest, Schüssler Fiorenza’s proposals with regard to HJR, including the politics of interpretation, the shift to memory and orality studies, and the evaluation of meaning-making itself, are theoretically critical and self-reflexive in a way which the Third Quest has rarely been. Given the emphasis Schüssler Fiorenza places on self-evaluation, and her critical examination of the work of her peers in HJR, one is led to consider the possibility that her work may represent a Third Quest Critical-Stream, or even a Fourth Quest.

中文翻译：

---

伊丽莎白·舒斯勒·菲奥伦扎和对历史耶稣的追求

摘要伊丽莎白·舒斯勒·菲奥伦扎的女权神学和历史著作遭到了不同的回应。对于女权主义圣经学者来说，舒斯勒·菲奥伦扎（SchüsslerFiorenza）是必不可少的读物，即使她的1970年代和1980年代的作品仍然是关键参考点。然而，对于主流（“雄性”）圣经学术而言，她的整个著作通常都被忽略，包括在历史耶稣研究（HJR）中，尽管它在质疑和推进所谓的《历史耶稣探索》方面具有价值。通过评估和综合SchüsslerFiorenza的HJR在原教旨主义，女权主义和反犹太主义方面的工作，本文将SchüsslerFiorenza的影响以及她的批评家在《任务》中的可信度归为前提。尽管SchüsslerFiorenza主题涉及女权主义和犹太教，是第三个任务的主要特征，舒斯勒·菲奥伦扎（SchüsslerFiorenza）关于HJR的建议，包括解释政治，向记忆和口头研究的转变以及对意义形成本身的评估，在理论上具有批判性和自我反省性，第三任务很少。鉴于舒斯勒·菲奥伦扎（SchüsslerFiorenza）对自我评价的重视，以及她对HJR同事的工作进行的批判性考察，人们认为她的工作可能代表着第三次任务的关键流，甚至第四次任务。