当前位置: X-MOL 学术Netherlands International Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Some Observations on Wrongfulness, Responsibility and Defences in International Law
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2016-10-01 , DOI: 10.1007/s40802-016-0071-0
Jure Vidmar

In this article, I argue that international law has a major structural crack: the limited international legal capacity of non-states, and a high threshold of attribution to states. A great deal of international conduct thus remains unregulated. I further explain that this is not only a gap in responsibility but in fact a gap in international legal regulation. The law of international responsibility overlaps with the law of international legal capacity. For the most part, it is thus only states and international organisations which are even conceptually able to violate international law directly. If a certain conduct is not attributable to them, it will not be internationally wrongful. I also suggest that the division between the primary and secondary rules of international law is confusing and arbitrary, and certainly should not be understood as a sequential order. In the conclusion I argue that scholarship has been perhaps too preoccupied with addressing certain symptoms of the ‘great structural crack’ in international law, while the real problem lies in the unclear concept of international legal capacity.

中文翻译:

国际法中不法、责任和抗辩的若干观察

在这篇文章中,我认为国际法有一个重大的结构性裂缝:非国家的国际法律能力有限,归属于国家的门槛很高。因此,大量国际行为仍然不受管制。我进一步解释说,这不仅是责任上的差距,而且实际上是国际法律监管上的差距。国际责任法与国际法律行为能力法重叠。因此,在大多数情况下,只有国家和国际组织甚至在概念上能够直接违反国际法。如果某种行为不能归咎于他们,就不是国际不法行为。我还建议,国际法主要规则和次要规则之间的划分令人困惑和任意,并且当然不应该被理解为一个连续的顺序。在结论中,我认为学术界可能过于专注于解决国际法“结构性大裂缝”的某些症状,而真正的问题在于国际法律能力的概念不明确。
更新日期:2016-10-01
down
wechat
bug