Abstract This paper argues not only that Schelling, Novalis, and Friedrich Schlegel are reacting directly to Kant (rather than simply to each other and to other post-Kantian figures), but also that they are responding in complex ways to one particularly prominent and distinctive line of thought in Kant, namely his account of reason, conditions, and the unconditioned. Though Kant argues that we cannot have cognition of unconditioned objects, he none the less thinks that reason demands that we accept the existence of such objects. The paper argues that the German Romantics take over this general line of thought, though they do so in different contexts and to different ends. Specifically, focusing on this dimension of Kant’s thought allows us to see both how the logic of conditioning relations can be seen to be driving their arguments for the Absolute, and how Kant’s particular conception of conditioning relations gives rise to important differences from the views of the German Romantics. For whereas he distinguishes different kinds of real conditioning relations, they operate with a generic conception of conditioning that leads to their distinctive Romantic views.

中文翻译：

---

康德与德国早期浪漫主义的无条件与绝对

摘要本文不仅论证了谢林，诺瓦利斯和弗里德里希·施莱格尔正在直接对康德做出反应（而不是简单地对彼此以及对后康德时代的其他人物）做出反应，而且他们还以复杂的方式对一个特别突出和与众不同的事物做出了反应。康德的思想路线，即他对理性，条件和无条件的描述。尽管康德认为我们不能认识无条件的物体，但他仍然认为理性要求我们接受这些物体的存在。该论文认为，德国浪漫主义者接管了这一总体思路，尽管他们是在不同的背景下和不同的目的进行的。具体来说，专注于康德思想的这一维度，我们既可以看到如何看待条件关系的逻辑如何推动他们对绝对的论证，又可以看到康德的条件关系的特殊概念如何与德国浪漫主义者的观点产生重大差异。 。因为尽管他区分不同类型的实际调节关系，但它们以调节的一般概念进行操作，从而导致了他们独特的浪漫主义观点。