Abstract In Schillerʼs On Grace and Dignity of 1794, his critique of the alleged ‘rigorism’ of Kantian ethics is particularly harsh: Kant has developed an ethic for “servants” that suppresses human nature for fear of it and does not reconcile it. The essay attempts to show that this critique is based on Schillerʼs double misunderstanding: a misunderstanding of the Kantian conception and a misunderstanding of its own alternative model. This analysis and interpretation of Schillerʼs critique of Kant’s ethics also leads to the realization that Schillerʼs idea of morality is ultimately more rigid than Kantʼs theory, which was so harshly criticized.

中文翻译：

---

“但是房子的孩子怎么使他只照顾仆人呢？”

摘要在席勒1794年的《论优雅与尊严》中，他对所谓的康德伦理的“严格主义”的批评特别严厉：康德为“仆人”发展了一种伦理，这种伦理压制人的本性是出于对人类本性的恐惧，并且不加以调和。这篇文章试图证明这种批评是基于席勒的双重误解：对康德概念的误解和对其替代模式的误解。对席勒对康德伦理学的批判的这种分析和解释还导致人们认识到席勒的道德观念最终要比受到严厉批评的康德理论更为僵化。