Abstract Salomon Maïmon argues that the formal determination of experience in Kant’s first Kritik insufficiently answers the question ‘quid juris?’. As an alternative to Kant’s theory, he develops a genetic transcendentalism in which experience is completely determined a priori. Discussing this genetic approach, I focus on how the spatiotemporal determinations of conscious experience are traced back to pure ideal relations. Relying on Leibniz and his theory of space and time, I explain how the extensive magnitudes of consciousness are founded in intensive magnitudes of what Maïmon calls ‘pure thought’. As the latter is the transcendental ground for both sensibility and the understanding, Maïmon’s theory contains a radical form of immanence, much like the philosophy of Spinoza and Gilles Deleuze.

中文翻译：

---

激进的内在思想与意识的起源：所罗门·梅蒙

摘要所罗门·梅蒙（SalomonMaïmon）认为，康德第一次批评中对经验的形式确定不足以回答“ quid juris？”问题。作为康德理论的替代方法，他发展了一种遗传先验主义，其中经验完全是先验地确定的。在讨论这种遗传方法时，我将重点放在意识体验的时空确定如何追溯到纯粹的理想关系上。依靠莱布尼兹及其时空理论，我解释了意识形态的广泛量级是如何在梅蒙所说的“纯思想”的密集量级中建立的。由于后者是感性和理解的先验基础，所以梅蒙的理论包含了一种内在的激进形式，就像斯宾诺莎和吉勒斯·德勒兹的哲学一样。