Abstract:This paper explores the connection between Slavic languages and the theoretical tenets of construction grammar, a cognitively and functionally oriented approach to linguistic analysis. The strengths of traditional Slavic linguistics consist particularly in its focus on diachronic concerns, lexical semantics, and on issues of morphology. Constructional analysis provides a firm theoretical grounding for these traditional areas and also draws attention to phenomena and issues that have been less prominently pursued by Slavic linguists. This concerns various kinds of syntactic patterning but also the domain of discourse organization and grammatical devices that serve specific discourse functions, be it the nature of pragmatic particles, specific clausal structures, expressions of subjective epistemic stance, etc. Of interest is also the origin and evolution of such devices. This area has been generally left just about untouched in Slavic linguistics, yet it represents an enormous pool of interesting data and relates directly to theoretical questions that are presently in the forefront of general linguistic research. With respect to the evolutionary perspective, the present paper also comments on the role of pragmaticization and constructionalization and their manifestations in particular instances, including suggestions for how they can be conceptualized with the contribution of construction grammar.

中文翻译：

---

为斯拉夫语言学服务的结构语法，反之亦然

摘要：本文探讨了斯拉夫语言与结构语法理论原则之间的联系，结构语法是一种面向认知和功能的语言分析方法。传统斯拉夫语言学的优势特别在于它关注历时问题、词汇语义学和形态学问题。结构分析为这些传统领域提供了坚实的理论基础，同时也引起了人们对斯拉夫语言学家不太重视的现象和问题的关注。这涉及各种句法模式，但也涉及为特定语篇功能服务的语篇组织和语法装置的领域，无论是语用词的性质、特定的从句结构、主观认知立场的表达等。令人感兴趣的是此类设备的起源和演变。这个领域在斯拉夫语言学中通常几乎没有受到影响，但它代表了大量有趣的数据，并直接与目前处于一般语言研究前沿的理论问题相关。从进化的角度来看，本文还评论了语用化和结构化的作用及其在特定情况下的表现，包括如何利用结构语法的贡献将它们概念化的建议。然而，它代表了大量有趣的数据，并且与目前处于一般语言研究前沿的理论问题直接相关。从进化的角度来看，本文还评论了语用化和结构化的作用及其在特定情况下的表现，包括如何利用结构语法的贡献将它们概念化的建议。然而，它代表了大量有趣的数据，并且与目前处于一般语言研究前沿的理论问题直接相关。从进化的角度来看，本文还评论了语用化和结构化的作用及其在特定情况下的表现，包括如何利用结构语法的贡献将它们概念化的建议。