Creole languages consistently show valency patterns that cannot be traced back to their lexifier languages, but derive from their substrate languages. In this paper, I start out from the observation that a convincing case for substrate influence can be made by adopting a world-wide comparative approach. If there are recurrent matches between substrate and creole structures in a given construction type, in creoles of different world regions and with different substrates, then we can exclude the possibility of an accident, and substrate influence is the only explanation. The construction types that I will look at are ditransitive constructions (Section 3), weather constructions (Section 4), experiencer constructions (Section 5), and motion constructions (Section 6). I will draw on the unique typological data source from the Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures (Michaelis et al ., 2013a; 2013b). My conclusion is that the data provided in AP i CS support the claim that during creolization, valency patterns have been systematically calqued into the nascent creoles.

中文翻译：

---

克里奥尔语中价态模式的全球比较证据

克里奥尔语始终显示出无法追溯到它们的词法语言，而是源自它们的底层语言的价模式。在本文中，我首先观察到，通过采用世界范围的比较方法可以为底物影响提供令人信服的案例。如果在给定的建筑类型中，在不同世界地区和不同基材的克里奥尔语中，基材和克里奥尔结构之间经常出现匹配，那么我们可以排除发生事故的可能性，而基材影响是唯一的解释。我将研究的结构类型是双及物结构（第 3 节）、天气结构（第 4 节）、体验者结构（第 5 节）和运动结构（第 6 节）。我将利用来自 Pidgin and Creole Language Structures 的独特类型学数据源（Michaelis 等，2013a；2013b）。我的结论是，AP i CS 中提供的数据支持以下说法：在克里奥尔化过程中，价态模式已被系统地归入新生的克里奥尔语。