Rashi is well recognized for his exegetical innovation of the peshat approach. He appears to claim to focus on peshat, but his reliance on the midrash is undeniable. In an attempt to better understand this problem, rather than focus simply on his definition of peshat, I suggest directing attention to the readerly involvement in constructing what is plain. Among the elements that are commonly thought to construct plain sense, I stress the variables inherent in the notion of context. To set the scope of a text constitutes a basis for what feels plain. If so, the disparity between Rashi’s peshat and the modern plain sense may be put in terms of the divergent scope of text set in action. I also suggest the gradual development of peshat can be situated in the broader cultural movement in 11th- and 12th-century Europe in which literate culture began to emerge.

中文翻译：

---

[去]构筑平原：拉希的peshat范围与文人心态的兴起

Rashi 因其对 peshat 方法的解经创新而广为人知。他似乎声称专注于 peshat，但他对midrash的依赖是不可否认的。为了更好地理解这个问题，而不是仅仅关注他对 peshat 的定义，我建议将注意力集中在读者参与构建简单的东西上。在通常被认为构成普通意义的元素中，我强调了上下文概念中固有的变量。设置文本的范围构成了感觉简单的基础。如果是这样，Rashi 的 peshat 与现代普通意义之间的差异可能在于行动文本的不同范围。