This article examines issues concerning the scope and role of victimology specifically as far as they relate to missing and disappeared persons. It argues that victimology ought to have a greater effect on the world by dealing with more victims, and that it should not be a solely academic discipline. It is contended that victimology should confront the real issues that arise for the victims after the crimes they suffer, and thus it needs to play a far more pragmatic, practical role. It is reasoned that broadening the study of who victims are, how they become victims and how their fate and suffering could have been avoided will also have a meaningful effect. This is also true regarding what can be done to reduce the numbers of (potential) victims. The article specifically calls on victimology to deal with victims who have gone missing. It argues that even amongst victimologists studying the widest variety of affected victims, there is almost no focus on the missing. The article goes into detail about who the missing are, and analyses the circumstances surrounding missing persons, whether as a result of war, human rights abuses such as enforced disappearances, or disasters, organized violence, migration and many more. The article also touches upon the processes of finding missing persons and considers their legal, technical and societal implications.

中文翻译：

---

为什么受害者学应该关注所有受害者，包括所有失踪者和失踪者

本文研究了与受害者研究的范围和作用有关的问题，特别是与失踪人员和失踪人员有关的问题。它认为，受害者学应该通过处理更多的受害者来对世界产生更大的影响，它不应该只是一门学科。主张被害人学应当直面被害人犯罪后所面临的真实问题，因而需要发挥更加务实、实际的作用。有理由认为，扩大对谁是受害者、他们如何成为受害者以及如何避免他们的命运和痛苦的研究也会产生有意义的影响。关于可以采取哪些措施来减少（潜在）受害者的数量也是如此。文章特别呼吁受害者学处理失踪的受害者。它认为，即使在研究最广泛的受影响受害者的受害者学家中，也几乎没有关注失踪者。这篇文章详细介绍了失踪人员的身份，并分析了失踪人员周围的情况，无论是由于战争、强迫失踪等侵犯人权行为，还是灾难、有组织的暴力、移民等等。文章还涉及寻找失踪人员的过程，并考虑了他们的法律、技术和社会影响。有组织的暴力、移民等等。文章还涉及寻找失踪人员的过程，并考虑了他们的法律、技术和社会影响。有组织的暴力、移民等等。文章还涉及寻找失踪人员的过程，并考虑了他们的法律、技术和社会影响。