当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Organizations Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The International Public Corporation
International Organizations Law Review Pub Date : 2017-06-29 , DOI: 10.1163/15723747-01401004
Dotse A. Tsikata 1
Affiliation  

The concept of the International Public Corporation (‘IPC’), elaborated by Wolfgang Friedmann in 1943 as a distinct sub-category of international organization, has disappeared from international law discourse. This paper argues that the IPC concept remains relevant and useful in classifying and analyzing international organizations for the following reasons. First, the prototype IPCs, the Bank for International Settlements (‘BIS’), the International Monetary Fund (‘IMF’), and World Bank remain in existence—their longevity and continuing importance reflects the viability and effectiveness of the IPC as a legal form. Second, the IPC model has continued to be propagated—many more IPCs have been established; the New Development Bank (the ‘BRICS Bank’) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (‘AIIB’) being the most recent. Third, the IPCs raise a distinct set of governance and accountability issues that have been the subject of review and reform efforts, which could benefit from a greater contribution by public international law scholarship.

中文翻译:

国际上市公司

由沃尔夫冈·弗里德曼 (Wolfgang Friedmann) 于 1943 年详细阐述的国际公共公司 ('IPC') 概念作为国际组织的一个独特子类别,已从国际法话语中消失。本文认为,出于以下原因,IPC 概念在国际组织的分类和分析中仍然具有相关性和实用性。首先,IPC 的原型、国际清算银行(“BIS”)、国际货币基金组织(“IMF”)和世界银行仍然存在——它们的寿命和持续的重要性反映了 IPC 作为法律的可行性和有效性。形式。其次,IPC 模式不断传播——更多的 IPC 已经建立;新开发银行(“金砖银行”)和亚洲基础设施投资银行(“亚投行”)是最新的。第三,
更新日期:2017-06-29
down
wechat
bug