Michael Tooley’s latest argument against the possibility of divine foreknowledge trades on the idea that, whichever theory of time is true, the ontology of the future—or lack thereof—gives rise to special problems for God’s prescience. I argue that Tooley’s reasoning is predicated on two mischaracterizations and conclude that, on at least some theories of time, the possibility of divine foreknowledge appears secure.

中文翻译：

---

Contra Tooley：神圣的预知是可能的

迈克尔·图利 (Michael Tooley) 反对神预知可能性的最新论点基于这样一种观点：无论哪种时间理论是正确的，未来的本体论——或缺乏未来——都会给上帝的预知带来特殊的问题。我认为，图利的推理基于两个错误的描述，并得出结论，至少在某些时间理论中，神圣预知的可能性似乎是可靠的。