Over the years, the Pilot Judgment Procedure has become a common element of the Strasbourg landscape. Since the first pilot judgment in the case of Broniowski v. Poland in 2004, the procedure is now a well-recognised mechanism for solving systemic and structural problems. Nevertheless, it is not the only measure of solving large-scale dysfunctions arising from the legal systems of States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) has developed several mechanisms designed to eradicate systemic and structural problems, such as: Quasi-Pilot Judgments, Third Tier Judgments, Simplified Committee Procedure, Grouped Judgments, Joined Judgments, Judgments of Principle, and other methods, concerning mostly effective “Case-Management”. This article presents and analyses these methods used by the ECrtHR in order to eliminate structural and systemic problems and dysfunctions.

中文翻译：

---

审判程序和其他形式的处理大型功能障碍的方法在欧洲人权法院判例法中的应用

多年来，试点审判程序已成为史特拉斯堡景观的共同要素。自2004年在Broniowski诉波兰案中作出第一项初步判决以来，该程序现已成为解决系统和结构问题的公认机制。然而，这不是解决因《欧洲人权公约》缔约国的法律制度引起的大规模功能障碍的唯一措施。欧洲人权法院（ECrtHR）建立了旨在消除系统性和结构性问题的几种机制，例如：准先决判决，三级判决，简化委员会程序，成组判决，联合判决，原则判决和其他方法，涉及最有效的“案例管理”。