This article deals with the divine knowledge of particulars in Averroes’ Tahāfut al-tahāfut and Ḍamīma. It examines how the concept of relation, generally neglected, is at the heart of the dispute between Avicenna, al-Ġazālī, and the Commentator. In al-Ġazālī’s eyes, Avicenna's misconception of divine knowledge “in a universal way” is based on a misuse of relation in the case of God's knowledge. If particulars change and God does not, his knowledge of particulars, insofar as it undergoes change, can be considered a pure relation without ontological consequences. Averroes contests both al-Ġazālī’s criticism and his proposal, despite the fact that, for different reasons involving the coming-to-be of human knowledge, he too employs the notion of pure relation in his Long Commentary on the Physics.

中文翻译：

---

关系是上帝对 TAHĀFUT AL-TAHĀFUT 和 ḌAMĪMA 的特殊知识的关键：AVERROES、AL-ĠAZĀLĪ 和 AVICENNA 之间的对话

这篇文章讨论了阿威罗的神学细节。Tahāfut al-tahāfut和Ḍamīma. 它考察了通常被忽视的关系概念如何成为阿维森纳、阿扎利和评论家之间争论的核心。在 al-Ġazālī 看来，阿维森纳对“以普遍方式”的神圣知识的误解是基于对上帝知识的关系的误用。如果细节改变而上帝没有改变，那么他对细节的认识，只要它经历改变，就可以被认为是一种纯粹的关系，没有本体论的后果。Averroes 对 al-Ġazālī 的批评和他的提议提出质疑，尽管事实上，由于涉及人类知识的形成的不同原因，他也在他的著作中采用了纯粹关系的概念。物理学长评.