This article examines the constitutionality of Article VII of the 1958 New York Convention ( NY Convention) under Egyptian and Jordanian law. Under Article VII , which provides for the application of the more-favourable-right provision, the winning party in an arbitration can rely on any regime provided by the local legal system to recognize and enforce the arbitral award. In doing so, the winning party can bypass provisions under which the losing party can resist enforcement. This article examines whether Article VII constitutionally provides modes of enforcement by which the winning party can enforce a legal arbitral award as well as providing grounds of refusal by which the losing party can resist enforcement of illegal awards. As such, this article examines the constitutionality of Article VII , and asks whether it balances the interests of the winning party and the losing party under constitutional law in Egypt and Jordan.

中文翻译：

---

根据埃及和约旦法律，1958 年纽约公约第七条的合宪性

本文根据埃及和约旦法律审查了 1958 年纽约公约（纽约公约）第七条的合宪性。根据规定适用更优惠权利条款的第七条，仲裁中的获胜方可以依赖当地法律制度提供的任何制度来承认和执行仲裁裁决。这样做时，胜诉方可以绕过败诉方可以拒绝执行的规定。本文考察了第七条是否在宪法上规定了胜诉方可以执行合法仲裁裁决的执行方式，以及提供了败诉方可以拒绝执行非法裁决的拒绝理由。因此，本文审查了第 VII 条的合宪性，