It is not always easy to interpret Grotius’ constitutional theory that lies hidden within his book on the law of war and peace. After a very concise discussion of this constitutional framework, this study turns to various interpretations and conclusions by contemporary scholars that sit awkwardly within the theory. The interpretations of Richard Tuck, Peter Borschberg, Knud Haakonson, Frank Grunert, Deborah Baumgold, Marco Barducci, Daniel Lee and Gustaaf van Nifterik are discussed critically.

中文翻译：

---

对格劳秀斯批评者的答复。论宪法

解释隐藏在格劳秀斯关于战争与和平法的书中的宪法理论并不总是那么容易。在对这个宪法框架进行了非常简洁的讨论之后，本研究转向了当代学者在理论中尴尬的各种解释和结论。Richard Tuck、Peter Borschberg、Knud Haakonson、Frank Grunert、Deborah Baumgold、Marco Barducci、Daniel Lee 和 Gustaaf van Nifterik 的诠释进行了批判性讨论。