当前位置: X-MOL 学术American Imago › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Scientific Theory on the Couch: A Response to Scott C. Taylor
American Imago Pub Date : 2019-01-01 , DOI: 10.1353/aim.2019.0022
Randall Paulsen

As I enjoyed wrestling with this rich and original paper a dream-like image came to my mind: Scott Taylor has placed science, itself, on the couch. As this body of science experiences being on the couch, it discovers that it has lost the ability to dismiss psychoanalysis as non-scientific because the psychoanalytic method now dwells inside it. The heartbeat of the psychoanalytic method (an observed relationship which provides a setting for dreams, associations, transference, and resistance) gives life to this body. In my response to Taylor, I would like to first touch upon the experience of individuals in psychoanalysis; then I will reflect on Loewald’s connection with Thomas Kuhn and psychoanalysis, before finally asking, has psychoanalysis ever been a “normal science”?

中文翻译:

沙发上的科学理论:对 Scott C. Taylor 的回应

当我享受与这篇丰富而原始的论文搏斗时,一个梦幻般的形象出现在我的脑海中:斯科特泰勒将科学本身放在沙发上。当这门科学在沙发上体验时,它发现它已经失去了将精神分析视为非科学的能力,因为精神分析方法现在存在于其中。精神分析方法的心跳(一种观察到的关系,它为梦想、联想、移情和抵抗提供了一个环境)赋予这个身体生命。在我对泰勒的回应中,我想首先谈谈个人在精神分析中的经历;那么我将反思 Loewald 与 Thomas Kuhn 和精神分析的联系,最后问,精神分析是否曾经是一门“常规科学”?
更新日期:2019-01-01
down
wechat
bug