Draghi’s short sentence appeased the financial markets and by and large the Member States followed the credo and established the Banking Union 3 The crisis to be managed had a limited focus – monetary and fiscal policy – with broad implications for the economy and society in the European Union (EU) and the Member States, however In the potential euphoria surrounding new perspectives, it should not be forgotten that the current crisis management by the EU Member States relies on the full functioning of key economic sectors – food production and supply, banking, healthcare, transport, the Internet, energy – more often than not provided by multinational, transnational corporations, national incumbents and supermarket chains There will be lessons to learn as to who will benefit from the crisis – Member State politics, national governments, multinationals, online business, transport of goods – and who will suffer: the EU as an institution, the European legal order based on the four freedoms and competition, national parliaments, small and medium-sized companies and non-essential economic sectors In his letter to P van Parijs, Rawls asks whether “meaningless consumerism” could be a legitimate aim for the EU and for a European society 10 Davies and Taguri highlight the societal and cultural implications of ever-increasing consumer choice in the Internal Market 11 The one-sided promotion of online business, which empties our cities and transforms physical communication into online orders, is just one visible expression of what is excluded from the toolbox of European law – not only to investigate potential gains in economic growth through increased efficiency and increased effectiveness of political objectives through fully harmonising European private law rules, but also to seriously look into their impacts on society

中文翻译：

---

电晕威胁–重新思考欧洲经济宪法和欧洲私法的机会

德拉吉的简短句子平息了金融市场，大体上各成员国都遵循了信条，成立了银行业联盟3。要处理的危机的重点是有限的货币和财政政策，对欧盟的经济和社会产生广泛影响（EU）和成员国，但是在围绕新观点的潜在欣欣向荣中，不应忘记，欧盟成员国当前的危机管理依赖于关键经济部门的全面运作-食品生产和供应，银行，医疗保健，运输，互联网，能源–往往不是跨国公司，跨国公司，国家老牌企业和超级市场连锁店提供的。谁能从这场危机中受益，我们将要学习一些教训–会员国政治，各国政府，跨国公司，在线业务，货物运输以及将遭受的苦难：作为一个机构的欧盟，基于四个自由与竞争的欧洲法律秩序，各国议会，中小型公司和非必要经济部门罗尔斯向P van Parijs提问，“无意义的消费主义”是否可能成为欧盟和欧洲社会的合法目标10戴维斯和塔古里强调了内部市场中不断增长的消费者选择所产生的社会和文化影响11推广在线业务，这会清空我们的城市并将实体交流转化为在线订单，只是欧洲法律工具箱中排除的内容的一种可见的表达方式–不仅是通过充分协调欧洲私法规则来通过提高效率和提高政治目标的有效性来调查经济增长的潜在收益，而且还要认真研究其影响在社会上