当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Health Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Strasbourg Medical Expulsion Rulings: Beyond the Deathbed Requirement
European Journal of Health Law Pub Date : 2020-03-02 , DOI: 10.1163/15718093-12251008
André den Exter 1
Affiliation  

For decades, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has applied a restrictive interpretation on the Article 3 threshold in extradition cases. The removal of aliens from the contracting state is lawful unless the applicant faces an imminent risk of death (D v. the United Kingdom (St Kitts)). However, with the Paposhvili ruling the Court has lowered the deathbed requirement to a more favourable standard as confirmed in the latest Savran case. But will those facing medical expulsion really benefit from this new standard at national level?



中文翻译:

史特拉斯堡医疗驱逐令:超越病床要求

几十年来,欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)在引渡案件中对第3条阈值进行了限制性解释。除非申请人面临即将死亡的危险,否则将外国人从缔约国驱逐出境是合法的(D v。United KingdomSt Kitts))。但是,根据波波什维利(Paposhvili)的裁决,法院已将病床的要求降低到了更优惠的标准,正如最新的萨夫兰(Savran)案所证实的那样。但是那些面临医疗驱逐的人真的会从国家层面的这项新标准中受益吗?

更新日期:2020-03-02
down
wechat
bug