当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ecclesiastical Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Parliamentary Report
Ecclesiastical Law Journal Pub Date : 2016-08-08 , DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x16000594
Frank Cranmer

On 9 May, the EU Justice Sub-Committee of the House of Lords, chaired by Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, published a report on the Government's proposals to repeal the Human Rights Act and replace it with a new Bill of Rights – and suggested that there was a forceful case for a Government rethink: The proposals the Secretary of State outlined did not appear to depart significantly from the Human Rights Act – we note in particular that all the rights contained within the ECHR are likely to be affirmed in any British Bill of Rights. His evidence left us unsure why a British Bill of Rights was really necessary. If a Bill of Rights is not intended to change significantly the protection of human rights in the UK, we recommend the Government give careful thought before proceeding with this policy … the repeal of the Human Rights Act and its replacement by a Bill of Rights would be a constitutional change of the greatest significance.

中文翻译:

议会报告

5 月 9 日,由男爵夫人 Helena Kennedy QC 担任主席的上议院欧盟司法小组委员会发表了一份报告,内容涉及政府关于废除《人权法》并以新的《权利法案》取而代之的提议——并建议是政府重新思考的有力案例:国务卿概述的提议似乎与《人权法》没有太大的不同——我们特别注意到,《欧洲人权公约》中包含的所有权利都可能在任何英国权利法案中得到确认。他的证据让我们不确定为什么英国的权利法案真的是必要的。如果一项权利法案不打算显着改变英国对人权的保护,我们建议政府在继续执行这项政策之前仔细考虑……废除《人权法案》并用权利法案取而代之将是具有重大意义的宪法变革。
更新日期:2016-08-08
down
wechat
bug