Focusing on some contemporary Islamic reformers’ solutions, in particular, Abolkarim Soroush, Mohsen Kadivar, and Fazlur Rahman, to concrete issues in Muslim societies, this article examines two different methodological strategies of alternative readings of the Sunna: an archeological one and a genealogical one. In the archeological perspective, the holy text has been considered as a repository of answers to all sorts of questions. Through a pathological analysis, this view suggests solutions to correct distortions and looks for new windows seeking an original interpretation of the Qur’an. The genealogical view, on the other hand, puts aside this pathology and instead insists on the idea of the contingency of any interpretation. Regardless of accuracy and validity, according to the genealogical view, all interpretations have addressed temporal and contextual questions. What is important in this perspective is not returning to an original source for finding the exact message of Allah, or correcting previous interpretations, but recurrently referring to an open-ended text in order to explore the futures of the Qur’an.

中文翻译：

---

非原教旨主义回归本源：新伊斯兰改革者的（重新）解释方法

本文着眼于一些当代伊斯兰改革者，特别是 Abolkarim Soroush、Mohsen Kadivar 和 Fazlur Ra​​hman 对穆斯林社会具体问题的解决方案，研究了两种不同的圣行替代阅读方法策略：考古方法和谱系方法. 从考古学的角度来看，圣经被认为是各种问题答案的宝库。通过病理分析，这种观点提出了纠正扭曲的解决方案，并寻找新的窗口，寻求对古兰经的原始解释。另一方面，谱系学观点将这种病态放在一边，而是坚持任何解释的偶然性的想法。不管准确性和有效性，根据系谱学的观点，所有解释都涉及时间和背景问题。从这个角度来看，重要的不是回到原始来源以找到真主的确切信息，或纠正先前的解释，而是反复引用开放式文本以探索古兰经的未来。