In The Realm of Criminal Law, Antony Duff argues that the criminal law’s realm is bounded by territory. This is because a polity decides what it cares about in crafting its civic home, and it extends its rules and hospitality to guests (non-citizens). I question whether the most normatively attractive conception of a Duffian polity would be bounded by territory, or whether it would exercise far more extensive jurisdiction over its citizens wherever in the world they may be (active personality) and over harm to its citizens/interests wherever in the world the attacks occur (passive personality).

中文翻译：

---

境界

安东尼·达夫（Antony Duff）在《刑法领域》中指出，刑法领域受领土限制。这是因为政体决定了其在建造市民住宅时的关注点，并将其规则和款待扩展给了客人（非公民）。我怀疑达菲政治体系中最具规范吸引力的概念是否会受到领土的束缚，或者它是否会对世界上任何地方的公民（积极的人格）行使更广泛的管辖权，以及是否对其公民/利益造成伤害？在世界上发生攻击（被动性格）。