In Foucault’s Futures: A Critique of Reproductive Reason , Penelope Deutscher explores the “suspended reserves” in Foucault’s writing, “absent concepts and problems [that] can be given a shape in potentially transformative ways within philosophical frameworks which have omitted them Deutscher (Deutscher 2017 , p. 5).” Deutscher pays particular attention to neglected figures of children in Foucault’s works and she develops the notion of “responsibilization,” processes of dividing populations into legible and illegible reproductive moral agents. This review of Foucault’s Futures considers Deutscher’s methodological innovation as it relates to Foucault’s own method of genealogy. While the notion of “suspended reserves” risks privileging the academic over the “wide cultural surfaces” of power, Foucault’s Futures provokes a queer critical ethics against ongoing violence of responsibilization.

中文翻译：

---

回顾佩内洛普·多伊彻，福柯的未来：对生殖理性的批判

在福柯的未来：生殖理性批判中，佩内洛普·多伊彻探讨了福柯写作中的“暂停储备”，“缺失的概念和问题可以在哲学框架内以潜在的变革方式被赋予形状，而哲学框架却忽略了它们（多伊奇，2017 ，第 5 页）。” 多伊彻特别关注福柯作品中被忽视的儿童形象，她发展了“责任化”的概念，将人口划分为清晰和模糊的生殖道德主体的过程。这篇对福柯未来的评论考虑了多伊彻的方法论创新，因为它与福柯自己的谱系学方法有关。虽然“暂停储备”的概念有可能使学术界凌驾于权力的“广泛文化表面”之上，