当前位置: X-MOL 学术Constitutional Political Economy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Turn-taking in office
Constitutional Political Economy Pub Date : 2020-04-21 , DOI: 10.1007/s10602-020-09308-4
Daniel J. Smith

This paper provides a theoretical explanation for the adoption of turn-taking in office. Turn-taking in office is where two or more individuals are elected to serve individual terms for the same public office, with the exclusive right to exercise the public office rotating among those elected individuals at intervals shorter than the term. Turn-taking enables the benefits of shorter tenures to be realized without incurring, to the same extent, the costs associated with setting an equivalently shortened term and term limit regime. Turn-taking would be most likely to emerge among a factional electorate in order to generate support for shared governance institutions. A case study of three high-level public offices in the Republic of Venice provides evidence of the operation of turn-taking. The tripartite presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina provides a modern-day example of some aspects of office turn-taking in operation.

中文翻译:

办公室轮流

本文为办公室轮换的采用提供了理论解释。Turn-taking in office is where two or more individuals are elected to serve individual terms for the same public office, with the exclusive right to exercise the public office rotating among those elected individuals at intervals shorter than the term. 轮转可以实现更短任期的好处,而不会在同样程度上产生与设置等效缩短的期限和期限限制制度相关的成本。轮换最有可能出现在派系选民中,以便为共享治理机构提供支持。威尼斯共和国三个高级公职机构的案例研究提供了轮换运作的证据。
更新日期:2020-04-21
down
wechat
bug