Is Anscombean practical knowledge independent of what the agent actually does on an occasion? Failure to understand Anscombe’s answer to this question is a major obstacle to appreciating the subtlety and plausibility of her view. I argue that Anscombe’s answer is negative, and turns on the nature of mistakes in performance, and reveals a distinctive implicit metaphysics of mind and knowledge, structured by related capacities and exercises of capacities. If my interpretation is correct, then practical knowledge shares features with knowledge-how and knowledge-that, but deserves its own epistemic category.

中文翻译：

---

实用知识的形而上学

Anscombean 的实践知识是否独立于代理人在某个场合实际所做的事情？无法理解 Anscombe 对这个问题的回答是欣赏她观点的微妙性和合理性的主要障碍。我认为 Anscombe 的回答是否定的，并打开了表演中错误的本质，并揭示了一种独特的隐含的思想和知识的形而上学，由相关的能力和能力的练习构成。如果我的解释是正确的，那么实践知识与知识——如何和知识——具有共同的特征，但值得拥有自己的认知范畴。