If today the departments of “cultural management” (in its broadest term) have been in existence for almost four decades, it is in part because of the existence of the “cultural industries”. If this concept’s founder and critical theorist, Theodore Adorno, indeed stigmatised cultural industries as “predominance of profit … over culture”, how can the rise and importance of this academic field be accounted for? This article proposes to reconstruct, analytically, a narrative of the rise of arts and cultural management departments, established almost two decades ago in Istanbul and which has been producing graduates in Turkey since that time. This article argues that, as a micro-case, the knowledge that this experience affords us is worth discussing and taking into consideration while trying to address the question of “cultural industries” as a pedagogic field.

中文翻译：

---

在文化管理教育中培养关键的人：从土耳其的文化艺术管理计划中学习

如果今天“文化管理”部门（广义上）已经存在了将近40年，那部分是因为“文化产业”的存在。如果这个概念的创始人和批判理论家西奥多·阿多诺（Theodore Adorno）确实将文化产业污蔑为“利润占主导地位……超过文化”，那么如何解释这一学术领域的兴起和重要性？本文建议以分析的方式重建对艺术和文化管理部门崛起的叙述，该叙事建立于大约二十年前在伊斯坦布尔，自那时以来一直在土耳其培养毕业生。本文认为，作为一个小案例，