In the recent architectural debate, there has been a renewed interest on the topic of brutalist architecture as a sign for a search of a different point of view and a necessity of filling the void in the architectural historiography. Striving to go beyond the conventional opinions on Brutalism , the two researchers presented in this paper are collocated in this context: 99FILES project, an open international call, promoted by the research Laboratory Landscape_inProgress, and OPERATIVE ATLAS of 15 case studies from Skopje. Both of the projects intend to become a device for re-thinking of Brutalism as well as to develop a reflection from which to learn how to deepen into the knowledge of the architectural production of the 60s and the 70s. This different vision becomes fundamental for Skopje, where the architectural and cultural heritage, built after the earthquake in 1963, has always been marginalized and is now in danger to be erased. By overcoming the ideological barriers, it is possible to re-read other modernities that have characterized the Balkan architecture, and reassign what is now perceived as an unloved heritage (Mrduljaš, M., Kulić, V. 2012), a familiarity in the urban physiognomy.

中文翻译：

---

99 个文件，用于当代巴尔干城市的 OPERATIVE ATLAS_devices

在最近的建筑辩论中，野兽派建筑这一话题重新引起了人们的兴趣，这是寻找不同观点的标志，也是填补建筑史学空白的必要性。为了超越对粗野主义的传统观点，本文中介绍的两位研究人员在这种背景下并置：99FILES 项目，一个公开的国际电话，由研究实验室 Landscape_inProgress 推动，以及来自斯科普里的 15 个案例研究的 OPERATIVE ATLAS。这两个项目都旨在成为重新思考粗野主义的工具，并发展一种反思，从中学习如何深入了解 60 年代和 70 年代的建筑生产知识。这种不同的愿景成为斯科普里的基础，那里的建筑和文化遗产，1963年地震后建成，一直被边缘化，现在有被抹去的危险。通过克服意识形态障碍，有可能重新阅读以巴尔干建筑为特征的其他现代性，并重新分配现在被视为不受欢迎的遗产 (Mrduljaš, M., Kulić, V. 2012)，城市中的一种熟悉相貌。