当前位置: X-MOL 学术Thesis Eleven › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Lukács in the 1920s and the 2020s: The practice and praxis of intellectual history
Thesis Eleven Pub Date : 2020-03-13 , DOI: 10.1177/0725513620911798
Richard Westerman 1
Affiliation  

This article examines different intellectual-historical approaches to the work of Georg Lukács, arguing that a methodology similar to that of the Cambridge School is, curiously, that most in line with Lukács’s own approach. I begin with some general methodological comments on intellectual history, before showing that a proper appreciation of the discourses within which Lukács was situated is essential to understanding both the specifics and the overall project of History and Class Consciousness. Finally, I argue that situating thinkers like Lukács properly within their time does not reduce them to museum pieces; rather, by seeking to capture the alterity of the past without reducing it to familiarity, we may de-reify our own world-views.

中文翻译:

1920 年代和 2020 年代的卢卡奇:思想史的实践和实践

本文考察了乔治·卢卡奇工作的不同知识-历史方法,认为与剑桥学派相似的方法论奇怪的是,最符合卢卡奇自己的方法。我从一些关于思想史的一般方法论评论开始,然后表明对卢卡奇所处的话语的正确理解对于理解历史和阶级意识的具体细节和整体计划至关重要。最后,我认为将像卢卡奇这样的思想家恰当地置于他们的时代并不会将他们缩减为博物馆作品;相反,通过寻求捕捉过去的他异性而不将其还原为熟悉,我们可能会去具体化我们自己的世界观。
更新日期:2020-03-13
down
wechat
bug