当前位置: X-MOL 学术Theory and Research in Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What makes a response to schoolroom wrongs permissible?
Theory and Research in Education Pub Date : 2020-03-01 , DOI: 10.1177/1477878520912997
Helen Brown Coverdale 1
Affiliation  

Howard’s moral fortification theory of criminal punishment lends itself to justifying correction for children in schools that is supportive. There are good reasons to include other students in the learning opportunity occasioned by doing right in response to wrong, which need not exploit the wrongdoing student as a mere means. Care ethics can facilitate restorative and problem-solving approaches to correction. However, there are overriding reasons against doing so when this stigmatises the wrongdoing student, since this inhibits their learning. Responses that avoidably stigmatise students impermissibly undermine both the developmental ethos of education, and students’ recognition and respect for each other as equals.

中文翻译:

是什么让对课堂错误的回应是允许的?

霍华德关于刑事处罚的道德强化理论有助于证明对学校儿童进行支持性矫正是正当的。有充分的理由让其他学生参与因对错误做出正确反应而带来的学习机会,而不必将做错的学生仅仅作为一种手段。护理伦理可以促进恢复性和解决问题的纠正方法。然而,当这会污蔑不法学生时,有压倒一切的理由反对这样做,因为这会抑制他们的学习。可以避免地对学生进行污名化的回应会破坏教育的发展精神,以及学生对彼此平等的认可和尊重。
更新日期:2020-03-01
down
wechat
bug